ACL 1001
Reading Contemporary Fiction
Semester 1 2010
Footscray | St Albans

Lecture 2
Reading Contemporary Fiction

by Ian Syson

This lecture will trace the rise of the study of Literature in Britain and beyond, paying particular attention to the work of F.R. Leavis. It will also focus on ways of defining and reading contemporary fiction.

Terms

  • Canon
  • Theory
  • Fiction
  • Contemporary fiction

In this unit, we read literature published after 1970. In many courses taught at university level, introductory units look at texts published much earlier, often in a particular historical period.

  • Renaissance
  • Romantic
  • Victorian
  • Modern

Typically students read those writers deemed to be the greats of these eras.

When taken as a whole, these writers and their works are sometimes referred to as the canon of English literature, the great works.

The �literary canon' is a collection of literature deemed to be �good' based on particular societal values.

In this unit w e think about the notion of a literary canon and the types of texts included in it. The literature taught in this unit challenges �the canon'.

Terry Eagleton points out that

the so-called �literary canon�, the unquestioned �great tradition� of the �national literature�� is �a construct, fashioned by particular people for particular reasons at a certain time' (11).

So why was the �canon' constructed?

English literature as a discipline has its roots in the great changes of the 19 th century:

  • Period of democratisation
  • Industrial revolution
  • Rise of industrial capitalism and the exploitation of the world's natural resources and human labour
  • Demise of religion:

Matthew Arnold wrote in � Dover Beach '

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

Arnold was a school teacher and inspector who observed the collapse of religion and advocated its replacement by literature. If religion was failing us as a moral guide then literature could be its replacement.

In Culture and Anarchy he argued that literature provided us with the �best that has been thought and said� and that its reading could � make all men live in an atmosphere of sweetness and light�.

At this stage (c.1870) Arnold had a difficult job because English literature was not seen to be a suitable object of study in universities. He also had some conceptual problems because history has shown us that people who have read literature do not necessarily become decent people because of it.

F.R. Leavis

  • Cambridge Professor in 1920s � shortly after the war
  • Moral transcendence of literature � it could be obtained by close reading
  • Literature became the most important and central discipline according to Leavis and his acolytes.

Across the Atlantic a related school of criticism was developing: the New Criticism

�Good literature is of timeless significance; it somehow transcends the limitations and peculiarities of the age it was written in, and thereby speaks to what is constant in human nature'

�The literary text contains its own meaning within itself. It doesn't require any elaborate process of placing it within a context' (Barry, p. 17)

It was a school that seemed less concerned with the moral seriousness that Leavis propounded and more with the idea of aesthetic beauty.

The business of critical reading then was to read closely the words on the page and understand that everything else was unimportant

  • Authorial intention
  • History
  • Context
  • Moral purpose

Between 1920 and 1960 these two schools tended to dominate literary criticism.

Another social upheaval in the 1960s in which marginalised groups started to agitate for social change.

  • Women
  • People of colour
  • Youth
  • Homosexuals
  • Colonised people
  • National independence groups

All began to assert their existence and identity as against the anglo-masculine norm.

So too within literary studies:

The canon was, not surprisingly, dominated by texts written by white anglo-celtic men from England , Ireland and America and it was felt that the rules of inclusion into the canon were also effectively rules of exclusion for others.

New ways of thinking about literature emerged in this time, ways that broke down the closed and insular ideas of Leavisism and the New Criticism.

It also involved the rise of what became know as literary theory, ways of breaking down the old assumptions and analysing them and often rejecting them.

Perhaps one of the main assumptions to be rejected was the idea of the text having a single and central meaning.

Instead the notion of Culturally Activated Readers became important

�Meaning is a transitive phenomenon. It is not a thing that texts can have, but is something that can only be produced, and always differently, within the reading formations that regulate the encounters between texts and readers' (Bennett, 1994, p. 211).

Theory

What is Theory?

Jonathan Culler defines �theory' in four ways:

  • Theory is interdisciplinary
  • Theory is analytical and speculative
  • Theory is a critique of common sense, of concepts taken as natural
  • Theory is reflexive

Culler also asks What is literature; what is theory the theory of?

  • Language
  • Aesthetics
  • Intertextuality
  • Social and Political Function

fiction

Fiction is, superficially, an easy term to define. Simply it is

  • not fact;
  • made up
  • untrue
  • imagined
  • invented

Yet each of these definitions is not equivalent with the others. Just because something is not a fact does not mean it is untrue. Take the statement �The world would be a better place if everybody learned to be less selfish and became more sharing�. Is this a fact or not? It doesn't really make sense to see it in these terms. While it might be an imagined fact, is it also an invented one? Did I really think it up all on my own?

Arguably the statement is true. In a sense it is both a made up statement and a true statement.

And this is a tempting definition of fiction: something that is both made up (in the sense that it never happened) and true (in the sense that it is true to something: imagination; itself, the rules of fiction; life).

The word fiction comes from a root which means to fashion or form

  • positively this leads to those senses of the word which connote creation and invention
  • negatively this leads also to concepts like feigning and deception

And we have to be aware of both sides of the word.

Contemporary Fiction

Drawing all these threads together then, we can say that contemporary fiction relates to:

  • Literatures that challenge the traditional English canon
  • Literatures that explore questions of ethnicity, gender, sexuality
  • Literatures that are heterogenous
  • Literatures that provide a space for dissident and dissonant voices
  • Literatures that need to be read in their cultural contexts (Morrison, 2003)