Understanding the World with Information Technology
by
Neil Hooley and Lawry Mahon
Victoria University of Technology
The use of broadcasting as a method of teaching is one of the more recent developments in educational practice. Both an account of their novelty and of certain of the features associated with them, broadcasts to schools have called forth praise and criticism, according to ones point of view, which have gone to extremes. It has been pointed out by more than one observer that, in this field, both enthusiasm for a novel device and determined conservatism have been more obvious than that measure of certainty which springs from experimental investigation. (Thomas 1937)
As can be seen from this excerpt, not much has changed in the past fifty years. The same would be true of classrooms if the radio broadcasts were referring to Information Technology, using computer technology today.
This small book refers to research carried out in 1935 and 1936 after the introduction of lesson delivery wireless. It suggests that there are two extremes in acceptance or otherwise of the new technology, and that there is an urgent need to find out the facts about the effectiveness of the broadcasts in relation to the more conventional method of delivery.
This book also supplies information on the current state of the new technology in the developed world at that stage, suggesting that of the 24 countries that sent reports to the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation of the League of Nations, 23 reported that school broadcasting was a regular feature of their school systems. The book also reports that where countries have trialled broadcasting, it has become a "permanent feature" of their education systems, although by its very existence, the book is suggesting that school systems, teachers and others have not been rigorous in their questioning of the process. Other interesting parallels with the introduction of IT can be made by looking at the rapid expansion of the broadcast technology into the school system. The book states that the first broadcast in the US was in New York City in 1923, with similar attempts in England at around the same time.
Regular programs were gradually developed, and schools began to warm to the technology. In England by 1926, 678 schools were regularly listening to the broadcasts. Those grew to 2000 in a year, and doubled again by 1928, with 5000 schools participating in 1929. This rapid expansion reflects similar percentage increases in the use of Internet and the World Wide Web today, and reflects almost an identical time frame from the introduction of the new technology into schools, and the widespread, unquestioning acceptance of it as beneficial.
The book suggests that there are four main areas that need research, ignoring for the time being any "mechanical" issues:
(a) Curriculum. What subjects may be taught by means of broadcast lessons? Are there any aspects of certain subjects which are more suitable for broadcast lessons than others?
(b) Type of pupil: Are broadcast lessons equally suitable for all types of pupil? Are there for example, certain ages at which children obtain maximum benefit?
(c) Method: Does the broadcast lesson necessitate the development of new teaching techniques? If so, what are they?
(d) Coordination with other aspects of school life. What part may broadcast lessons play in the life of the school as a whole? (p.14)
The author then summarizes these four questions into one key issue: "Is the broadcast lesson an efficient medium of education?"
The example he gives is a similar challenge in the current era: "The broadcast music lesson...can bring into the classroom a national symphony orchestra, which the ordinary class music lesson can never do. On the other hand, the daily vocal exercises may well be conducted more efficiently by personal contact with pupils."
Communicating Society
We have had telephones available in the community for over a century. It is still a rare school that gives open access to each classroom to a telephone. One of the selling points for Internet and World Wide Web is that our classrooms can contact and collaborate with peers the world over. That has been possible for a very long time, through the classroom use of the phone. Teachers are beginning to carry mobiles - their own - on yard duty now, but the reasons are safety and security ones - not necessarily educational. The cost has been an inhibiting factor in the use of new technology in schools, and one can only wonder at the end result of radio access and speakers in every classroom starting at the height of the "Great Depression". A similar scenario has been evident with the newer learning technologies through the recession "we had to have" and the economically rational era. New computers were $3000 in the early eighties. They are still about that - but you need to hang a few bells and whistles off them if you want the full value. Another $500 for a modem, $300 for the right sort of sound card, and of course, $500 a year for the rest of your life for Internet and e-mail access.
The author of the 1937 document sees what others have said as valuable in understanding the direction the technology is taking and its impact on learning. He agrees that "the radio has firmly established itself as an educational instrument" and "broadcast lessons are an important and valuable auxiliary to the ordinary work of schools."
He quotes some other interested researchers as singing the praises of the technology.
"Radio programs expand immensely the pupilsí interest in people and things and events. It brought about the fuller reading of newspapers and magazines, of investigations into books and encyclopedias. It brought about discussions with other members of the family, in the home, and even a sufficient interest to induce other members of the family to "listen in" in their own home during the radio hour".
The conclusions of the study, which involved a traditional "control" group and "experimental" group, and followed traditional computational comparisons, were quite revealing. Teachers in charge of particular classes, where they felt unhappy about what was occurring in the testing phase, were invited to offer suggestions as to what was happening. In each case, teachers, despite what they saw in the results of the testing, believed that control groups always had better learning than the experimental groups. The teachers reckon the new stuff is not up to scratch!
In general, the testing offered "conflicting and indeterminate" results.
As at the end of 1937, society was none the wiser regarding the effectiveness of radio lessons. I can also report that in country Victoria in the 1950ís, the radio was used regularly for lessons - particularly music, as the teachers used the expertise of the professionals over the radio, rather than rely on their own knowledge. As a child in that era, I can also report that those lessons were looked forward to with great enthusiasm, and that the same technology was employed as soon as possible at home for evening entertainment. The outcome, is that, while I am not a member of a symphony orchestra, I can, however, play the radio.
Technological prospects for literacy and personal power
Radio continues to play an important cultural and educational role in the lives of people the world over and immerses listeners in a language-rich environment. Today, a range of technologies based on the microcomputer can also be used for literacy and learning purposes. Literacy is a central aspect of the democratic liberal ideal to which generations throughout the modern era have aspired. To be literate is a prerequisite for the informed participation in the scientific, cultural, political and economic life of the community, the basis on which reasoned action for improvement can be taken.
As a concept, literacy can be narrow or broad, ranging from the acquisition of technical skills for reading and writing, to that which according to The National Consultative Council for International Literacy Year (MacLeod, 1993) involves the capacity of people ë...to think, create and question, which helps them become aware of the world and empowers them to participate more effectively in society.í
The possibility of achieving a fully literate community as the basis of social participation, regardless of class, creed, or economic circumstance, has proven itself elusive and is unlikely. However, the Brazilian educator and activist, Paulo Freire (1974) has shown how it is possible to develop the literacy of peasants by beginning with key ideas and words that are significant to their daily lives, the creation of visual expressions of such ideas, group discussion of the images and concepts and finally, a new and critical codification that transform the learner from passive object to active subject. The approach of Freire sees illiteracy as oppressive and education therefore, as liberation.
Noone and Cartwright (1997) describe a ëcritical pedagogy, that is, a way of engaging in the teaching/ learning process which questions taken-for-granted understandings, whether these understandings occur within the studentsí own tacit knowledge, or within some part of the canon.í
They also suggest that a ëcritical literacy pedagogyí encourages students to develop approaches that enable a ëcritical view of society and culture.í Critical literacy is therefore clearly demarcated from a functional literacy that confines consideration of language to its technical basis and does not locate meaning within a social and political context.
Over recent years, attention has been drawn to the impact that information and communication technologies are having on the processes of reading. Spender (1995a) has noted that rather than reading from left to right and from top to bottom of a page, ë..the screen reader must have eyes that dart around and make sense of a multitude of moving images.í Here it is being claimed that literacy is undergoing a fundamental change as occurred in other times and that the advent of the microcomputer means that ënewer skills, not fewer skillsí are required.
The nature and extent of literacy amongst the young continues to be debated. A recent summary report in Australia (Ainley, 1997), indicated that for junior secondary school students ë..there has been little change in reading ability between 1975 and 1995í with about seventy percent achieving competency. Again, Spender (1995b) comments on difficulties with definition and assessment of literacy and the tendency of commentators to discuss discrepancies and statistics and not ëthe entire reading enterprise.í For example, given that millions of children and adults around the world now have daily access to microcomputer technologies in communities that are both advantaged and disadvantaged and that this will increasingly be the case, the influence that such techniques are having on literacy cannot be ignored. It may be that computer-based technological change will offer the best opportunities for critical literacy that have yet been available or conceived.
Technology for human benefit
In common usage, technology is often referred to as the application of scientific knowledge for human purpose. However, this technical understanding of process denies thinking about doing and the moral questions associated with human action. Heidegger (1977) for example, comments that ëTechnology is therefore no mere means. Technology is a way of revealing. It is the realm of revealing, that is, of truth.í
Technology can be considered as a way of knowing, in the same way that a person can investigate the world in a variety of mathematical, artistic, or linguistic manners. Dewey (see Hickman, 1992) also had an epistemological view of technology seeing the tools and methods of the scientific era as important adjuncts in the process of understanding through personal experimentation and enquiry.
In the early 1980ís, Papert (1980) suggested that the microcomputer need not support a skill-based or technical approach to education and that his Logo program encouraged children to become active problem solvers and researchers. Although important, the historic contribution of Logo was not whether it embodied an open-ended approach to mathematics and indeed, to thinking itself, but whether it demonstrated that the products of technology generally speaking, need not be technical in character. Papert (1985) emphasised that if schools were to change for the better, to be student-centred and less instrumental, then it was necessary to concentrate on the broad culture of the school rather than the technology itself
In discussing how children learn informally with computers, often in collaboration with adults, often taking a leading position and more often than not enthusiastically jumping into the intellectual unknown, Papert (1995) astounds by describing such engagements as representing, ..the biggest steps for childhood since the transition from oral to literate cultures.í Consequently, he advocates that there is a need to revise ë..concepts of childhood shaped in bygone epoch.í This analysis of modern life firmly locks technological change with literacy and of course, critical literacy, for adults and children alike.
Information technology and critical literacy
In a review of computer application for educational and literacy use, Derewianka (1994) comments on how the new technologies support a ënon-linearí approach to reading, writing and thinking. Like Spender, she notes that the structure of texts on the screen will alter as we integrate image and sound. However, this should not denigrate the importance of print and books in their current form, it is more a case of being familiar with different techniques for communication and information gathering.
The range of computer application for critical literacy is potentially wide, depending on the structure of the learning environment. For example, computer games, multimedia, authoring programs, music, graphics, robotic control, word processing, hypertext, virtual reality and expert systems, all provide the opportunity for informal and creative learning interactions.
Extensive diffusion of the Internet and electronic mail across educational, business and community locations has already enabled millions of people around the world to search for information and to communicate with each other, thereby opening up new avenues for personal challenge and learning. The prospect of artificial intelligence platforms of varying degrees of sophistication, allowing for questioning, inference and unpredictability in situations that closely resemble human relationships, will also help establish the conditions for critical literacy and critique.
Development of a critical pedagogy and literacy demands that learning begins with the life experiences of the participants, a genuine respect for personal knowledge and the capacity of all people to learn, grow and change. These conditions which support a ëpractice into theoryí orientation, are required both in schools and in community structures so that the learning being undertaken is part of the ongoing struggle for social existence, not separate from it. Critical literacy is very much a part of the philosophical ësearch for explanationí in which all people engage throughout their lives and on which decisions regarding personal and political questions will be made.
Perhaps the major difference between the pursuit of functional literacy or critical literacy, is the role of the human actors involved. In the former case, the relationship is essentially instructional and technical, while in the latter, the relationship is essentially constructional and moral. Critical literacy must emerge from environments that are democratic, collaborative, experiential and social, if human meaning is to make sense in relation to the cultural milieu in which it is based. Upon this understanding, the incorporation of information and communication technologies should enable critical literacy and cultural action to be intimately linked and substantially enhanced.
Knowledge Ownership
There is a new dimension, however, to the technology in schools dilemma.
Further to M.E.Thomasí questions should be added Michael Singhís questions related to power and knowledge:
Take the computer class in the average high school. Data bases and spread sheets. The children are continually told this is the stuff technology is for. The lessons and the tests are dominated by this curriculum.
In their spare time, the children with access to the technology are hooking up to the Internet, using chat lines and playing games with spectacular technical sophistication. There is a wonderfully revealing sign on a lab window on the 5th floor at the Footscray campus warning of the consequences of anyone caught "surfing the net". Anyone caught doing THAT, will be dragged to the public flogging area, and given what for! This demonstrates that those with the powerful knowledge decide what everyone else "should know" in order to be allowed into the club. "If you donít know what I know, you canít join in." The dilemma appears to be arriving at the decision about what needs to be known in any discipline, and how to arrive at it. This is fundamentally a decision about democracy, power and control. Thomas asked in the thirties about the challenge to teaching techniques - the same issue is at stake again. We know the power relations have to change, but we know our powerful positions as the holders of important and exclusive knowledge are tenuous at best. The kids are better at using the technology than we are. Our response so far has been similar to "my dadís better than your dad". You might be better at the technology than I am, but the test is on the life circle of the tsetse fly.
We are constantly marinating in this "Toe the line" mentality. From a functional/ notional approach to literacy, which excludes a massive portion of our community from full participation, to government funding of schools dependent on tests like the LAPS. If you donít do what you are told, you wonít get any funding. And if your results arenít good enough, you are obviously not using the funding wisely, so it will be cut.
So, where to from here? Ask the 30ís question again? Come up with the same answers? Kids knew then that the stuff was good - fun, enjoyable, new. Research showed it made no difference. There is still a dilemma in the educational research arena. But children have been voting with their feet. They have judged in favour of the new technology. It is up to us to pay for it.
References
Ainley, J. (1997) Reading and Numeracy in Junior Secondary School: Trends, Patterns and Consequences, ACER.
Derewianka, B. (1994) Literacy in the Age of Infotech, COM 3, Vol. 21 No 1/2, p20.
Freire, P. (1974) Education for Critical Consciousness, Sheed and Ward.
Heidegger, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper and Row, p12.
Hickman, L. A. (1992) John Deweyís Pragmatic Technology, Indiana University Press.
MacLeod, J. (1993) The concept and importance of literacy, in Out of School Literacies Reader, Deakin University, p105.
Noone, l. and Cartwright, P. (1997) Abrasions: Dilemmas of Doing a Critical Literacy Pedagogy within/ against the Academy in Selected Proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: Research and Practice, Victoria University of Technology, Vol. 1, pp234 - 235.
Papert, S. (1995) The Parent Trap, SCORE: The National Periodical For Teachers, Vol. 3 No 5, p 9.
Papert, S. (1985) Computer criticism vs technocratic thinking, LOGO ë85 Theoretical Papers, MIT: Boston.
Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books.
Spender, D. (1995a) New literacy is not just screen deep, The Weekend Australian, 2-3 November, SYTE p 4.
Spender, D. (1995b) Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace, Spinifex.
Thomas, M.E. (1937) An Enquiry Into the Relative Efficacy of Broadcast and Classroom Lessons, ACER. Melbourne University Press. Educational Research Series, No. 48.