logo.gif (2061 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hsa.gif (5771 bytes)

Projects 2001

Literacy and numeracy training practices in industry: a comparative study across three industries.

Aim/Rationale

Much still needs to be explored in the way of trainers judgments about effective practices to facilitate learning.  This study examines how trainers create learning environments through

·        teaching and learning activities;

·        organized or ad hoc training repertoires; and

·        negotiations with stakeholders regarding mechanisms for delivery.

The study is based on a comparative analysis of trainer data collected across three different contexts and is guided by an interest in the manner in which cross-industry practice might inform developments in each site.  Industries to be investigated include those of seafood, retail and agriculture and horticulture.

Research Questions

  • How do trainers understand the terms literacy and numeracy across the three sites?
  • What factors influence the inclusion of literacy and numeracy skills development in the delivery of training units?
  • What pedagogic practices are chosen to facilitate learning and what is the rationale behind these choices (pedagogy here refers to the integration of content, trainer strategies and learner involvement)?
  • What assessment strategies are selected to report on learning and what effect do the actual assessment practices have on performance/recording that performance?
  • What professional development activities are available to trainers to improve their capacity to make judgments about training?

Methodology

  • Invitation to participate in the research extended to RTO’s in the designated industries followed by an information meeting to outline the research purpose and to negotiate data collection processes.  The project will aim for a group of trainers representing three training contexts.
  • Group training exercises with trainers to mentor in data collection processes: narrative writing to describe training settings; reflection exercises to gauge trainee learning; journal exercises to describe training strategies and critical incidents in training; collection of assessment exemplars and teachers responses to these exemplars.
  • Analysis of data (joint with participants and independently by the principal researcher) to identify similarities and differences in training understandings, judgments and techniques. A key component of analysis will be the identification of indicators for successful training as articulated and evidenced by trainers and trainees at the various research sites.

Outcomes

The research will be reported as case studies from the three sites.  An introductory section will provide an analysis of the research aims and a comparative study of the findings across the three sites.

A separate document will be developed as a resource for trainers. It will provide a summary of the findings and will include a compilation of ‘good practice’ criteria to assist trainers in their work.

For further information contact ruth.trenerry@unisa.edu.au

 

| Home | About | Message Board | State Centres | National Projects | Publications | Links |